
Anti-Virus Comparative - Performance Test (Internet Security Products) – October 2014 www.av-comparatives.org
- 11 -
Summarized results
Users should weight the various subtests according to their needs. We applied a scoring system in
order to sum up the various results.
For “file copying”, we took the mean values, as well as for “launching applications” (on subsequent
runs). As in previous performance reports, “very fast” gets 15 points, “fast” gets 10 points, “medio-
cre” gets 5 points and “slow” gets zero points. This leads to the following results:
AV-C Score PC Mark Score TOTAL Impact Score
ESET
90 98.8
188.8
1.2
Avira, Bitdefender,
Kaspersky Lab, Sophos
90 97.7
187.7
2.3
Kingsoft
88 97.8
185.8
4.2
Baidu
88 97.3
185.3
4.7
Qihoo
85 97.8
182.8
7.2
AVG, Fortinet
85 97.1
182.1
7.9
Avast
83 98.3
181.3
8.7
AhnLab, F-Secure
80 98.0
178.0
12.0
Emsisoft, eScan
80 97.7
177.7
12.3
Panda
80 97.5
177.5
12.5
McAfee
80 97.1
177.1
12.9
ThreatTrack Vipre
80 96.7
176.7
13.3
Trend Micro
78 96.5
174.5
15.5
BullGuard
76 97.3
173.3
16.7
Tencent
73 94.8
167.8
22.2
Lavasoft
68 96.7
164.7
25.3
The out-of-box system impact score with enabled Windows Defender on Microsoft Windows 8.1 is 9,6.
Comentarios a estos manuales